beta
Text
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.
The crime of this case was committed seven times by opening a car free from the defendant and using cash, etc., and committed a theft of the victims' property owned by the victims. In light of the method and contents of the crime, etc., the crime of this case was considerably poor, and even though the defendant was punished by larceny by the so-called "vehicle Name", which is the same method as the crime of this case on March 13, 2020 and March 25, 2020, even though he was punished by a fine on the same method as the crime of this case on March 13, 2020, the crime of this case started again more than two months, and the risk of recidivism was considerably high, and the damage was not recovered to other victims except the victim E, and the defendant was not recovered from the victims, and the defendant did not receive from the victims. Although the defendant committed the larceny of the victim E, the defendant himself after committing the thief, and even after the crime of this case, the remaining larceny was committed disadvantageous to the defendant.
On the other hand, the fact that the defendant acknowledges the crime of this case and reflects the mistake in depth, that the defendant did not have any criminal record other than the above two-time criminal records of larceny, that the amount of damage is not significant, that damage was returned to the victim E, and that the defendant is a youth of the 20 major group of larceny, etc. are favorable to the defendant.
In full view of the aforementioned factors and other factors of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background leading to the commission of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.
Therefore, it is true.