Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while divorced from the former wife B, was living together with the victim C from March 1, 2010 to October 20 of the same year. The victim was working in the Busan Northern District Office located in Geum-gu, Busan. The victim is a person who retired from the said company on December 1, 201, when the Defendant and the non-defluence relationship were committed by the following Defendant and B.

1. On February 1, 2011, the Defendant of defamation around February 1, 201, at around 16:00, found together with B in front of the Victim C’s house located in F G apartment, 107 Dong 505, located in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and when the above B saw B as drinking the victim’s house, and the victim’s house door door as drinking the victim’s house, the Defendant also read B as “this year’s house opening with the victim’s house opening with the victim’s house door as drinking,” and “the victim’s house opening with the victim’s house opening with the victim’s house opening with the victim’s house opening as drinking.” The same letter as “the victim’s house 107 front day of the above apartment house and the victim’s house opening.”

(h)the winding;

Chewing tearing

On June 201, 201, the Defendant made a call to the call center at the head office of E in which the victim was working at the place where the police officer was in his/her own seat on June 1, 2011, thereby damaging the honor of the victim by openly pointing out facts. On July 4, 2011, the Defendant called “whether or not the victim has become in his/her own seat.” On or around July 4, 2011, the Defendant called the victim’s reputation by phoneing an employee under the name of the U.S. deputy Office located in the Busan Northern District Office located in his/her own territory, and by openly pointing out facts. On or around July 4, 2011, the Defendant called the victim’s reputation to an employee under the name of the victim.

The honor of the victim was damaged by publicly alleging the fact that it is called "the year, the same year, and how it can be used for the company."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the Police Statement regarding C 1.