logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.04.20 2016가단240201
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant C Co., Ltd.:

A. From December 26, 2015 to April 2018, 2018, Plaintiff A’s KRW 157,080,000 and its amount.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 24, 2015, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) (hereinafter “Defendant”), on the ground of the land of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E, E, F, and G (hereinafter “instant newly built site”), shall directly perform construction works of constructing urban-type residential housing on a scale of one story below ground, five stories above ground, total floor area of 1,171.4 square meters (hereinafter “new construction works of this case”). However, during the new construction works of this case, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) contracted for underground excavation works and soil removal works (hereinafter “the instant new construction works”).

On the other hand, Defendant D is a supervisor of the New Construction Corporation.

B. The Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) owned J 109 square meters adjacent to the site of the instant land destruction work (hereinafter “instant land”) and the 58.08 square meters away from the ground brickd slves house (hereinafter “instant housing”), and the Plaintiff B owned the Plaintiff’s son.

C. The Defendant, without obtaining the construction permit on the instant newly built construction, had H perform the instant construction work from December 2, 2015.

H The representative director I reported that he will perform the instant land destruction work differently from the design drawing of the instant land to the L, who is the actual operator of the Defendant’s K and Dong and who holds 20% of the Defendant’s shares, and that he will perform the instant land destruction work with his consent. D.

Even if the new site of this case was excavated at least 8m, the Defendant did not construct 16 fish poppy (Earth Anchor) specified in the design map and replaced it with the burner team. 4 parts of the belt, which was designed by 30,000, and the Defendant did not install a safe soil straw for earth pressure, such as installing a type of CIP (Cast Pil) pole in length that falls short of the design.

E. The defendant

arrow