Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are jointly operating real estate development business chain G in ASEAN-si F. G.

On June 16, 2008, the Defendants obtained approval of the industrial distribution-type plan, such as the construction of a factory site for three lots (70,354 square meters) such as H, I, and J (70,354 square meters), and completed the construction of a factory site development project (hereinafter “the primary factory site development project”), and subsequently, completed five lots (40,00 square meters), such as Asan-si K, L, M, N,O, etc. (hereinafter “the secondary factory site development project”).

On March 2010, the Defendants stated that “The secondary factory site development project is being implemented next to the primary factory site development project, so the Defendants supplied aggregate to the representative Q Q Q of the victim P Co., Ltd., a aggregate supplier, at the site of the second factory site. The price shall be paid by the end of the following month after the end of the month.”

However, at the time, the above secondary factory site development project was delayed without being applied for the approval of the district unit plan, and the Defendants and G stock companies did not have any import on the wind for which the approval procedure of the district unit plan is delayed without any particular property. Therefore, even if aggregate is supplied from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendants were supplied with aggregate amounting to KRW 95,70,00 from the time of the false statement to October 201, 201. On October 18, 2011, the Defendants were supplied with aggregate amounting to KRW 95,70,00 from the victim to the above Q, and were supplied with aggregate amounting to KRW 121,954,00 from the victim around that time to the end of March 201. In addition, the Defendants were supplied with aggregate amounting to KRW 400,00 in the land for the creation of the new house in Asia-si. (the aggregate amounting to KRW 225,250,00 in the market price) to the above Q.

As a result, the Defendants conspired, deceiving the victim, thereby deceiving the property amounting to KRW 217,654,00.

Summary of Evidence

1..