1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,728,700 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 20, 2016 to April 26, 2018.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Road project (B) - Project operator: Daejeon Regional Construction and Management Administration - Public announcement of project approval: C publicly notified by the Daejeon Regional Construction and Management Administration on May 9, 2014;

(b) The date of expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on February 26, 2016 - The date of expropriation on April 19, 2016: ① (i) the Plaintiff’s ownership of ① the size of 236 square meters prior to D, E forest land, ② the size of 123 square meters of E forest land, ③ the size of 67 square meters of F forest land (hereinafter referred to as “D land”), and the total number of each of the above lands, and the compensation for losses amounting to KRW 132,572,80 - the appraisal corporation: the appraisal corporation, the Japanese appraisal corporation, and the Lian appraisal corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection on November 24, 2016 - Compensation for losses: 135,426,700 won increased the compensation for each of the instant lands (the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have increased the amount of compensation for each of the instant lands at KRW 135,426,70 (the Plaintiff’s ruling on expropriation shall be deemed to have increased the amount of compensation for trees

- An appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation, and one appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation, and one appraisal corporation, are not allowed to accept the Plaintiff’s assertion on the ground that the project implementer deemed the owner of the trees of this case and the container of this case as G (mutual name: H) and notified the G of the calculation of compensation amount.

D. Results entrusted to the appraiser I by this Court (hereinafter “First Court Appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: 141,210,400 won for each of the instant lands.

E. The result of the court's entrustment to the appraiser J (hereinafter referred to as "the second court's appraisal") - Contents of appraisal: 153,010,800 won for each of the lands of this case [the ground for recognition: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (which include the number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

(i)each description of Eul evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, each of the results of this Court’s expert evidence I and J’s request for expert appraisal);

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. Each of the instant lands shall be the gas station site.