1. The application for participation by an independent party intervenor (Counterclaim Defendant) and the principal suit against the Defendant by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) respectively.

Basic Facts

A building B located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) consists of 126 households and 208 residential buildings, as a main complex building with the fourth and twenty above ground level.

(2) The building management body of the building of this case was established under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “the Aggregate Buildings Act”), but the management body of the building of this case did not establish the actual regulations or appoint a manager. The apartment of this case was managed by the council of occupants’ representatives of the apartment of this case, and the commercial building of this case (hereinafter “the commercial building of this case”) by the council of occupants’ representatives of the apartment of this case.

The shopping mall association concluded a management service contract with the Plaintiff and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), and the Plaintiff and G managed the instant shopping mall from January 1, 2012 to December 2017.

On October 27, 2016, the Defendant Intervenor purchased the instant building H heading or heading I during the voluntary auction procedure.

【In the absence of dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 9, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), each entry of Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and the part of the part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part of the whole part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time

Therefore, an independent party intervenor filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff to confirm that there is no obligation for management expenses, and against the defendant that the management body of the commercial building of this case is an independent party intervenor.