The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance on the grounds of appeal, and asserted only mental and physical disorder and unfair sentencing as to the judgment of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of second instance on the grounds of appeal.

In this case, the argument that there is an error of mistake or misunderstanding of legal principles in the judgment below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just for the court below to reject the defendant's claim on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.