logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.16 2015가합2344
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s relationship 1) From March 2, 2015 to March 2, 2015, the beauty art management department at CUD D University (hereinafter “ beauty art department”).

) The professor serving as the professor holding concurrent posts was assigned to serve as the professor, and the year 2015 also gives an image seminars “the class” (hereinafter “instant class”) in the first semester.

2) The Defendant, as a graduate school student of the beauty department and graduate school, was in charge of the president of the beauty department and graduate school around 2015.

B. On February 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) as a president of the Republic of Korea, announced a first semester curriculum to students of the beauty department and graduate school in 2015, which included the instant curriculum; (b) was entitled to a claim from some students to the effect that the Plaintiff cannot hear the Plaintiff as a person with the power to commit the instant curriculum; (c) the Defendant: (d) had ten students and ten students of the same day and confirmed that the Plaintiff’s writing about the Plaintiff was true while having talked with E who managed the beauty department as a professor of the beauty department; and (e) having taken the attitude of knowing that E was irrelevant to the Plaintiff’s ability as a professor while making a statement to the effect that it was irrelevant to the Plaintiff’s ability as a professor; and (e) the said students and E left the school student’s choice to decide whether to teach the instant curriculum.

3) On March 4, 2015, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the instant class was designated as a major unit, and that there is no room for choice. On the same day, around 13:20 of the same day, the Defendant shall hold a meeting to gather the students’ opinions as to whether the Plaintiff would hear the Plaintiff’s class as the principal head from the beauty department and the fourth floor lecture room (hereinafter “instant meeting”).

A) During the instant session, the following statements (hereinafter referred to as “instant statement”) were made:

AB made it.

The plaintiff has a problem in the course of study, and continues to be fluencing, and fluencings have been well fluencing.

arrow