1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as follows, except for the parts which are dismissed or added as follows, and thus, it is identical to the statement from No. 2 to No. 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Parts to be removed or added;

A. According to the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, the first to nine are as follows.

If each of the above money is appropriated in the order of appropriation of performance as indicated in the separate sheet, the Defendant’s compensation amount of KRW 42,56,902 as of August 9, 2016 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 1,63,751 per annum from November 2, 2015. However, the Defendant designated the Plaintiff to appropriate the above money to repay the principal amount of the damages in the same manner, and the amount paid by P and E, a joint tortfeasor, should also be appropriated to repay the principal amount of the damages in the same manner. However, there is not sufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant, P and E, as of August 9, 201, set forth in the separate sheet No. 15, set forth above, set forth in the separate sheet No. 222, and No. 15, set forth above, set forth in the separate sheet of appropriation of performance to the principal at KRW 1,679,000,000,000,000 per annum.