beta
Text
1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, ..
Reasons
1. The following facts, which have become final and conclusive in the judgment subject to a retrial, are apparent or apparent in records in this court:
The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants on February 9, 201, the Jeju District Court 201Gahap2063, and was sentenced to the judgment of the first instance court against the Plaintiff on February 9, 2012. The Plaintiff appealed against the said judgment and filed an appeal under this Court ( Jeju) 201Na428. On December 26, 2012, the court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s appeal and dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the appellate court.
In response to the above appellate judgment, the Plaintiff filed an appeal by Supreme Court Decision 2013Da14248, but the Supreme Court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s appeal on May 9, 2013, which became final and conclusive around that time.
B. On January 20, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for a retrial against the judgment of this court ( Jeju) No. 2014Na428, which became final and conclusive on June 11, 2014, but this court rendered a judgment dismissing the lawsuit for retrial on June 11, 2014. Although the Plaintiff filed an appeal, the said judgment of the Supreme Court became final and conclusive on September 24, 2014.
C. On November 7, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for re-deliberation of the said judgment (No. 2012Na428) and the said judgment (No. 2014Na17) by this Court (No. 2014Na622). However, this court rendered a judgment dismissing the said lawsuit on April 29, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.
In other words, on May 29, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for re-deliberation of the instant judgment ( Jeju) No. 2014Na621 in this Court ( Jeju) on May 29, 2015, but this Court rendered a judgment dismissing the said lawsuit on March 23, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.
E. In other words, on June 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for retrial against the judgment of this Court (No. 2012Na428, No. 2014, No. 2017, No. 2015, No. 2015, No. 2011, Mar. 29, 2017).