A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2016, the Defendant driven a low-speed car at around 08:50, and proceeded at a speed of about 60 km per hour on the side of the complex culture center(s) with three-lanes on the three-lanes from the office of harmony, which is located in the 240-ro, a emulculation.

The Defendant, while driving at the two-lanes of the Victim C (49) driving at the time, did not turn on the direction-setting direction, followed by three-lanes, followed by a three-lane, and followed by the vehicle in front of the said vehicle. However, the Defendant: (a) changed the vehicle to the two-lane following the victim’s behind the vehicle while driving the vehicle; (b) was driven by the vehicle in front of the said chemical post office; (c) was driven by the vehicle in front of the said chemical; and (d) was driven by the Defendant’s vehicle after the vehicle in front of the vehicle driving by the vehicle in front of the said chemical post office.

As a result, the Defendant driven the above car, which is a dangerous object, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, damaged the above truck to the extent of KRW 918,289, such as the exchange of the front truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A traffic accident report (1) a actual survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act, Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act requires strict punishment as it damages injury and property due to the so-called retaliation driving, which has recently become a big social problem.

On the other hand, the defendant.