logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.12 2017고정923
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 26, 2015, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant is found in the Internet Nuriburf page used by the occupants of the apartment complex B, “I have the Doggggggggles.”

In the article posted as the title "," ", at the table of the apartment of the table of the table of the table, the victim C, who is the president of the table, has injured the victim C by openly pointing out facts by openly pointing out the comments stating "I think that I will be able to see the snow of South, South, North, and North, a person who spreads false facts, and women who do not know that I would like to be a woman who can be reported at our plenary session," by participating in the debate of "I think that I will be able to see that I will be able to pay electricity."

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

C. On May 11, 2017, after the institution of the instant indictment, a written agreement is submitted to the effect that the victim C does not want to be punished against the Defendant.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow