1. The defendant shall receive 20,000,000 won from the plaintiff and at the same time real estate stated in the attached list.

1. The assertion;

A. On February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that, with the Defendant, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with respect to real estate listed in the separate sheet, for 36 months from February 11, 2014 to February 36, 2014, deposit deposit 20 million won, monthly rent of 17 million won in advance on the 17th day of each month, and for 2 months from monthly rent, the lessor may terminate the lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

However, the defendant on March 17, 2015, and the same year

4.17.17. The same year.

5.17., 17. The same year

6.17.17. The same year

7.17.17. The same year

8. The monthly rent of KRW 10,200,000 has not been paid until August 17, 2015, such as the failure to pay the monthly rent for six months, including the 17. etc.

Therefore, the Plaintiff asserts that the instant lease agreement was terminated on September 4, 2015, on the grounds of the overdue charge of at least two months of monthly rent, and accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the separate sheet. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay 20% interest per annum from the day after delivery of the copy of the instant complaint to the day of complete payment, and 1,700,000 won per annum from September 17, 2015 to the day of delivery of the building indicated in the separate sheet.

B. On August 2015, the Defendant sought damages under Article 10-4 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act by asserting that “If leased real estate has been sold or sold, the lessor shall give the lessee a given period of 60 days and the lessee shall deliver the leased real estate within the given period to the lessor” was not transferred to Nonparty C under the instant lease agreement. However, the Plaintiff sought damages under Article 10-4 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act by asserting that there was no transfer of the right of lease with the assignee, by asserting that there was no transfer of the right of lease with the assignee of the lease agreement.”