The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the other trade union members of the D Union referred to “whether the C president and the team leader are not in contact with meals” at the night event of the D Union’s “the sent year” event, and there was only a conflict between the J and the J, and there was no warning that the J has impaired the honor of the victims.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the crime of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the judgment.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below, the defendant's assertion that "C was false to J, as stated in the judgment of the court below, as it stated in its reasoning, "I am why it would be why it would have been distorted or why it would have been made at the night of the transmitting year, and C came to contact with the chief director and team leader." It can be sufficiently recognized that the victims' honor has been damaged.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.