logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.08 2015고정634
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2009, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) jointly with B and C, at the office of Goyang-dong-gu D 1204 E, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, and C’s criminal act; B purchased LG electronic and TV at low price; and subsequently, the Defendant provided the above place and applied for a report of failure and request for acceptance in his name.

In addition, the victim F.F. who was designated as the repair engineer in charge accepted and returned to the said TV, he expressed his attitude that the victim would be at a disadvantage in the victim's personal affairs, unless the refund is requested and the refund is not taken. B expressed his attitude that the victim would be at a disadvantage in the victim's personal affairs.

Accordingly, the company's early settlement of the civil petition for repair of defects is considered to be an employee who caused customer complaints, and thus, the victim was able to know about whether he will be disadvantageous in personnel management, evaluation, etc., and eventually, the victim waivers the repair of the defective part of the breakdown and recommends the "repaid goods". On July 17, 2009, the victim company suffered 3,230,000 won from the LG Electronic Co., Ltd. under the name of the refund of TV products under the name of the defendant, from the bank account (Account Number: G) in the name of the E bank in which the defendant is using.

2. In collusion with B on September 2009, the Defendant filed a false request for report of failure or acceptance with B to the effect that B purchased Samsung Electronic and Television at a low price, and subsequently, B purchased it at a low price, and the Defendant provided the above place and applied for a false request for measures due to the natural breakdown of the said TV.

In addition, the Defendant and B showed a false attitude toward H designated as a repair engineer and visited for the same purpose, and require the above H to repair as soon as possible and caused H to do so.

arrow