logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2015.11.19 2015나21120
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 납골묘, 납골탑 및 납골당 시설의 설치 및 임대와 유지, 관리사업 등을 목적으로 하여 설립된 재단법인인 피고는 2010. 1. 28. 밀양시장에게 장사 등에 관한 법률 제15조 및 같은 법 시행규칙 제7조에 따라 밀양시 C, D 토지 지상에 지상 5층 규모로 건축된 봉안당(奉安堂, 과거에는 납골당이라는 용어를 사용하였다) 건물에서 5,030기 봉안당에 안치되는 유골의 수를 말한다. 를 안치할 수 있는 내용의 법인 봉안당 설치신고를 하고서 위 봉안당을 임대하는 사업을 운영하고 있다.

B. Around July 2009, the Defendant drafted an agreement with E that “The Defendant shall recognize and promise to pay KRW 900,000,000,000, out of the salary table of this case, to secure the said investment.” At the same time, E shall return 2,000, out of the salary table of this case offered as security, to the Defendant” (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

C. On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a bonds transfer contract with the purport that E shall take over KRW 450 million claims owed by E against the Plaintiff, and KRW 100 million out of the instant charnel house (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”). At that time, E sent the above assignment of claims to the Defendant as a certified mail, but the said content-certified mail was impossible to be served.

Accordingly, on February 24, 2015, the Plaintiff sent the assignment of claims to the Defendant by way of content-certified mail, and the said mail reached around that time.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1 through 7, 9, Eul 1's each entry (including Serial number), the whole purport of pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is against E to KRW 1,00 out of the salary table of this case.

arrow