beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around September 10, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to D victim D within a passenger car parked in front of the office of the C Co., Ltd. located in the Northern-dong at the port of port, stating that “The Defendant shall pay wages to the employees, shall be paid six years prior to the payment of the money that he/she lent to the company head, and may return the money that he/she has deposited in the account of the company head, and may return the money immediately if only the provisional seizure is made. If the employee fails to pay the wages, he/she shall file a complaint with the labor office, and if he/she fails to pay the wages, he/she may borrow KRW 10 million from the Labor Office until October 1, 2013. He/she may receive KRW 20 million from the additional apartment loan, and if arranging the company, he/she may receive KRW 100 million from the company.”
However, it was true that there was no provisional attachment of the passbook in the name of C Co., Ltd. operated by the defendant, and even if the defendant received the above money from the victim, the defendant was willing to use the above money by himself, and the apartment was found in the name of the apartment and was unable to receive the additional collateral loan at will.
The Defendant was indicted by having remitted money from the victim on September 17, 2013 on the same day on the same day, but appears to have remitted money on September 17, 2013 on evidence. However, even if the Defendant’s correction was made ex officio, it does not interfere with the Defendant’s right of defense, and thus, is corrected ex officio.
Defendant
The public prosecutor of the Han Bank account (Account Number:E) stated the account number of the defendant in the “F” and appears to have remitted the account number to E account on evidence. However, ex officio correction does not interfere with the defendant’s right of defense, so it shall be corrected ex officio.
Ro 87,00,000 won was remitted and defrauded.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Investigation reports (teleline investigation), investigation reports (Attachment to the result of execution of a search and seizure);