Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a home owner without a certain occupation, who has approximately KRW 20 million claims for C, and D and E are those who have worked as an insurance solicitor for Korean-style life, and currently operate a G cafeteria located in the Gunsan City as a partnership business.

Defendant

A (former H) was unable to receive KRW 20,000,000,000 lent to C, upon receiving a proposal from D that “I would receive money from a hospital after concentrating them on insurance if I introduced them, and then receive money from them.”

D Until January 23, 2013, from January 23, 2013 to April 31, 2013, the insurance premium was paid and managed after allowing C to buy four insurance policies, such as Korean Commercial Life, the insured, etc., and it was no longer binding upon B's prior inspection of insurance fraud in April 2013.

E followed the following behind the detention D, after having C purchase five insurance policies from May 6, 2013 to the 31st day of the same month, E paid insurance premium on behalf of the insurance premium.

C, immediately after the purchase of an insurance policy as above, was conducted on June 28, 2013, which was included in the mountain village, and was diagnosed by the Jwon located in the I of the Si of Gun, as the “surd salt for the right side,” and was hospitalized for 14 days until July 11, 2013.

However, in fact, C was falsely hospitalized for the purpose of receiving insurance money even though it is possible to receive outpatients without hospitalized treatment, but on July 19, 2013, C was hospitalized as above and claimed to pay insurance money.

7. A total of KRW 7,803,126 was paid on four occasions, such as the receipt of KRW 560,000 per day of hospitalization by C in the company bank account (the account number M in the K facts charged appears to be clerical error; hereinafter the account number M in the K facts charged).

As a result, C, A, D, and E obtained the amount by fraud in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect C;

1.C 4 times.