logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.05.26 2014고정289
협박
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on August 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim to F, who is a knife resident, on the ground that the Defendant reported to 112 by the victim E (the age of 51) in front of the house of D, which is located in the Dobong-gun, in the Gancheon-gun, reported to 16:0 on the ground that the Defendant: (b) expressed the victim to F, who is a knife resident, and “G (the husband of the victim), only knife and died; (c) knife knife knife knife knife, and knife knife knife knife

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement made by the witness H, E, I, J, F, and K (In comparison with each statement made by an investigative agency, each of the above statements is consistent and specific in the main part of the crime, as well as credibility in light of the attitude of the legal statement. Also, each of the above statements does not conflict with each other, and does not seem to conflict with each other, and it does not appear that the false statement would otherwise be published).

1. Each police statement to H, E, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the sequence 8, 12 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment did not have any record of being punished for the same crime, but the crime of this case was threatened by the victim's wife to harm his or her wife. Thus, the crime of this case was committed in consideration of the fact that the nature of the crime is inferior and that the defendant does not seem to reflect the mistake while denying the crime.

arrow