Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 16, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months in the Seoul Northern District Court for embezzlement, and the judgment was finalized on the 24th of the same month.
1. On November 2007, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would construct a golf course to the Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, which is a high school owner,” and that “The Defendant would have ordered the above golf course electrical construction by accepting the drawings and specifications of electrical construction from the design office to the victim. The Defendant would have ordered the above golf course electrical construction at the design office. The Defendant stated that “The golf course is constructed with two other persons and Dong-dong, and the other party can be seen as a partner in the construction with the above golf course’s establishment of a golf course, and the Plaintiff purchased one 80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”
However, the defendant did not have any other party with the construction of a golf course. However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to reduce the electrical construction of a golf course to the defendant, and there was no right to establish a golf course that can be sold at the time.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim a total of KRW 80 million, including KRW 50 million on November 19, 2007, and KRW 30 million on November 29, 2007, under the pretext of the purchase price for the establishment of the D golf course from the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.
2. On April 2008, the Defendant stated that “D golf course license is delayed, so it would be ordered first to do so, and the drawing of the business plan will be sent to the company,” and that “If our employees promised to do so to do so to do so to do so to another company, the Defendant would return KRW 100 million to the company and offer electrical construction to the company.”