All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on such unfavorable circumstances as the Defendants’ use of violence against the victims, and the Defendants’ use of cash or cyber money in a way of informing the victims of piracy to operate entertainment rooms, and the nature of the crime is very good in light of the type of crime, circumstances, and circumstances; the victims appear to have imprisoned due to the Defendants’ assault and intimidation; the victims did not want to be punished by the Defendants; but the victims’ G appears to not have received full payment of damages; the Defendants had been punished for the same crime several times; Defendant B was released from the facility, and Defendant B did not seem to have been able to have been tried to commit the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, which is only one month. However, the Defendants’ confessions all of the instant crimes; the favorable circumstances, such as the victims and agreement with the victims; and the victim’ age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and all of the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the court below’s allegation that the above sentencing of the Defendants is unreasonable or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.