Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a car car in D Kan-Pack.

At around 14:30 on June 26, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.169% from the upper 3km to the upper 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth f, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Ma-ro, 711-gil 2, Suwon-si, Seoul High-ro, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the statement of the situation of a driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. At around 10:00 a.m. on the day of this case, the defendant and his defense counsel got home at the construction site of this case by dividing the sick who had worked in the non-public domains by drinking them, and completed 1:30 p.m. at around 1:30 p.m. and parked in the resident preferential parking zone after returning home at 2:30 p.m. and then parked in the resident preferential parking zone at 2:0 p.m. at 30 p.m., the police was found at 4:33 p.m., and the defendant was dispatched to the vehicle parked in the resident preferential parking zone and was dispatched with a report on damage to the vehicle parked in the resident preferential parking zone, so drinking measurement was conducted on the ground that the defendant's entrance at the time of driving did not change the state of drinking alcohol by 169%.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, namely, ① the Defendant was able to have contacted the vehicles parked in the resident priority parking zone while returning to Korea at 2:30 p.m. on the day of the instant case, and taking into account the pictures of the shock level.