logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2015나56900
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

(b) daily KRW 00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000; and

Therefore, in order to make a bank loan, T with a provisional registration right holder shall set up five provisional registration transfer documents and provisional registration termination documents to the five persons, and all of these matters are agreed upon by C representative director E and guarantor U, and T with a provisional registration right holder, and the above contents are responsible and implemented.

T, a right holder of a provisional registration at the Pocheon-si site, shall transfer the registration to T without lending 4 households after the provisional registration is terminated.

A guarantor, U.S., within two months after a bank loan, will pay the amount borrowed by selling and buying four households (as of December 30, 2013), and if a creditor is unable to do so within two months, he/she will handle at will by himself/herself, and he/she shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability.

On October 22, 2013, this letter of consultation held on the condition of cash recovery, which was accompanied by the agreement of the debtor C representative E representative director E (Provisional Registry holder) * attached to the creditor V guarantor Y: if the debtor is to work in the certified judicial scrivener of W. 104 Dong 8 with T registered 8 households to T and if the bank loans amount to KRW 200 million to T, the next four households will be recovered from the executor.

In addition, the remaining four times shall consult with and affix seals to the President and U.S. as agreed.

(4) On October 24, 2013, 2013, the creditor RR’s U representative U letter of consultation (No. 4, hereinafter “this case’s letter of consultation”).

F. Since then, on November 20, 2013, V, X,Y, Z, AA, I, AB, AC, and the Defendant purchased the instant land from E. On December 20, 2013. On December 6, 2013, at the same time as the instant provisional registration was transferred, the registration of ownership transfer of the instant land was completed as the principal registration based on provisional registration. Accordingly, the registration of establishment of the neighboring land in the Plaintiff’s name, which was lower than the said provisional registration, was revoked ex officio.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Gap.

arrow