The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:30 on February 13, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant on the grounds that the Defendant did not have his own examination to the people around Pyeongtaek-si, including the victim C, and that he did not take his own examination, and when the Defendant took two-time face of drinking, the Defendant saw the Defendant as satis, against the Defendant’s satch, and satise the Defendant’s bat, and satise the Defendant’s bat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act as a defense for the other party's wrongful attack, in light of the motive and circumstance leading up to fighting between the other party's act, the process and contents of fighting, and the degree of violence committed by the defendant, etc., although the defendant's act has the nature of an attack against the other party's act and it cannot be seen as an act of attack socially acceptable defense, since it is difficult to view that the defendant's act has the nature of an attack against the other party's other party's act as an act of attack.