logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2020.06.12 2020노33
송유관안전관리법위반
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The defendant asserts that the punishment of the court below, which sentenced 1 year and six months of imprisonment, is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case committed by the Corporation thefts oil from the oil pipelines managed by the Corporation in collusion with its name in collusion, using oil facilities installed by the unsatisfies, which may lead to large-scale accidents such as explosion or fire of the oil pipelines in the course of the crime, and social harm and injury, such as the leakage of oil due to the damage of the oil pipelines, such as contamination of surrounding soil, is very large.

If it was not discovered in the I Corporation's exclusive storage system, the Defendant's act of theft appears to have continued.

The crime of this case was committed systematically by the defendant, such as the defendant's contact with his accomplice, and did not recover from damage to the I Corporation.

In 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a criminal offense such as acquisition of a tax-free gasoline which is a stolen taxpayer.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and is against the law.

Although the Defendant took part in the crime of theft of petroleum on the proposal of a person with no name, he did not take part in the establishment of an oil facility.

Although the prosecutor asserts that the defendant did not cooperate with the investigation of accomplices although he led the crime of this case, the defendant led the crime of this case according to the S's statement and evidence, including the protocol of interrogation of the defendant, submitted by the prosecutor in the trial.

It is not sufficient to recognize that accomplices did not cooperate in the investigation.

Rather, the defendant's investigation on April 10, 202 is conducted by the prosecution on April 10, 2020, except once on April 1, 2020.

arrow