A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 15, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Port Support, the summary order of KRW 4.5 million for the same crime from the Daegu District Court Racing Support on April 26, 2012, and the summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime in the same court on May 9, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (do referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (after an accident).

On August 13, 2016, at around 15:10 on August 13, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with 0.286% alcohol concentration in blood, was driven by the 28th national highways room room.

Since there is a narrow road without the separation of lanes, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by accurately operating the steering gear, brake system, etc. while a person engaged in driving the vehicle has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so, and thereby, received the front right side of the Defendant’s vehicle from the victim D (W, 33 years old) driving in the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to salt and tensions in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as seen above, and at the same time, did not take measures such as immediately stopping the said vehicle and providing relief to the injured party while destroying the said vehicle to bring about KRW 839,990.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.286% from the cargo vehicle office located in both a monthly Ri of Ansan-si, Seocho-si, Seoul, to the above accident place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. D.