1.(a)

Defendant M 3,168,256 won and each of them to Plaintiff B, Plaintiff A, C, D, E, F, and G.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the land survey division under the former Land Survey Decree (Ordinance No. 2, Aug. 13, 1912), it is written that O received an assessment of Quju-gun Q2342 square meters (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”), which is the mother land of Gyeonggi-gun P road 1,547 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) on November 20, 1913.

B. Since then, the mother land of this case was purchased by Korea for distribution under the former Farmland Reform Act (amended by Act No. 31 of Jun. 21, 1949 and repealed by Act No. 4817 of Dec. 22, 1994; hereinafter the same).

C. As the land of this case was restored on February 12, 1958, it was divided into the land of this case into 1,220 square meters, S road 468 square meters, and 654 square meters, respectively, and thereafter, the land of this case was changed into 1,547 square meters for the land of this case for the above Gyeonggi-do P road of 468 square meters.

On March 27, 1996, when the Republic of Korea did not distribute the instant land to farmers, on March 27, 1996, filed a registration of preservation of ownership on the instant land under the receipt of No. 17661 on March 27, 1996 by the Jung-gu District Court, Namyang-ju Office, and the said land has not been distributed to farmers until now.

E. After June 3, 2004, the Defendants, U,V, and W (hereinafter “Defendants, etc.”) filed a lawsuit against the Republic of Korea as Seoul Central District Court 2004Gahap42284 on June 3, 2004, stating that “The instant land, etc. was inherited by the Defendants, etc. from the deceased X, and thus, the procedure for registration of cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea on the instant land, etc. was fulfilled.”

On September 24, 2004, the above court rendered a judgment that “the land, etc. was owned by the net X at the time of November 20, 1913,” and sentenced the Defendants to “the Republic of Korea shall implement the registration procedure for cancellation of registration of cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership in the name of each Republic of Korea on the land, etc. of this case.”

The Republic of Korea appealed in Seoul High Court No. 2004Na76062, but the above court was the case.