A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, first aid, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by emergency medical personnel by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, force, or other means.

Nevertheless, at around 00 00:30 on August 27, 2019, the Defendant complained of 10 minutes of the breast-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, where he was in an emergency room for the delivery of chests due to taking out 10 minutes of drugs prescribed by the nethy department, and the Defendant took an emergency room for the treatment of the meata, the probation officer did not come to fall short of the hospital, the probation officer took an emergency room for treatment as soon as possible, followed the emergency room, followed the emergency room, and obstructed the emergency room’s first aid and treatment for the emergency patients under C (the age of 28).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the first aid and treatment of emergency medical personnel by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Photographss of the suspect's self-injury and destruction of his stuffed stuffs;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 60 (2) 1 and Article 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act - The time limit for and reflects crimes;

There is constant mental and medical treatment, and the direction of probation officers is also faithfully followed without reoffending.

- Even though the Defendant had been punished three times for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act during the period of probation, the Defendant committed the crime of this case, and was in danger of committing the crime, and did not receive a letter from the hospital or doctor interfering with medical treatment.

. The above.