beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, 10, and Eul evidence No. 1 to 7:
Plaintiff
1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff”)
(2) On October 10, 2014, the Plaintiff Company brokered Nonparty D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) with “E” as a broker, and D also imported the following: (a) as a broker; (b) as a broker, Nonparty D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”); and (c) as a broker, Nonparty C A’s 73 points and F bank 25 points and G bank 71 points.
However, as above, D transferred the above products to the Plaintiff Company on November 27, 2014 due to the poor condition of the imported bags.
3) Of the goods transferred from D, the Plaintiff Company requested for appraisal to H, an incorporated association, in order to verify whether or not the C bank’s products were true. Accordingly, on May 14, 2015, the said Association requested appraisal by sending the relevant C bank’s photograph to Nonparty I, a corporation conducting the business of protecting the trademark rights of a famous brand overseas. On the 22th of the same month, I sent a reply that one of the C bank’s products subject to appraisal request was appraised as a serious product. 4) The Plaintiff Company from June 15, 2015 to the same year.
7. By July 7, 200, the Plaintiff sold the C Household, etc. transferred from D through J Co., Ltd.
However, the Plaintiff Company filed a suspicion that some of the consumers who purchased the bags sold as above filed a complaint with the relevant investigation agency around September 2015, and filed a complaint with the relevant investigation agency, and directly requested the European Head Office to conduct the appraisal of the bags purchased.
B. On September 16, 2015, the investigation police station of the Plaintiffs: (a) seized C, G, K, and L bags from the Plaintiff Company on September 16, 2015; (b) seized C, G, and G, 43 points at the Plaintiff Company’s office and 58 points at the Plaintiff Company’s office on September 21, 201; and (c) on October 14, 100, the Plaintiff’s C, G, 4 points at the G, and G.