Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From May 2, 2017, the head of the production team division in the victim C Co., Ltd. engaged in the logistics of the damaged company, and the defendant B is running the E-lane transportation business by individually requesting logistics transportation from D.

If the injured company requests the freight carriage to D, D is engaged in the business of operating the freight trucking service for the freight trucking articles, including Defendant B, and upon completion of the transportation, D is charged with the freight trucking service by claiming the freight transportation cost from the victimized company and paying the freight trucking service the amount of 15 to 20% after receiving the freight transportation cost from the victimized company. Thus, Defendant A, who was in charge of the freight distribution service of the victimized company, was in charge of the freight trucking service, had the duty to review whether the freight claimed from D was calculated according to the distance of the actual freight transportation, and to pay the correct amount of transportation cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendants: (a) requested Defendant A to transport false logistics; or (b) requested Defendant B to transport logistics in excess of the actual distance of transportation; and (c) demanded Defendant B to claim transport charges from the victimized Company; and (d) demanded D to claim transport charges from the victimized Company; (c) received transport charges, excluding brokerage fees, from the victimized Company; and (d) conspired to divide them.

According to the above public offering, Defendant A: (a) designated a person in charge of transportation as Defendant B and requested the victimized company to transport 2,40,000 won at the place of business of the victimized company located in the Gyeonggi MilitaryF on April 1, 2019, as if it is necessary to transport 2,40,000 won of transportation expenses; and (b) Defendant B claimed KRW 2,40,000 of transportation expenses as if it actually completed the above logistics transportation and received KRW 2,00,000 from the victimized company as the Nong Bank account in the name of Defendant B from that time to December 31, 2019.