Text
1. The part concerning the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;
2. The defendant shall enter the attached list in the plaintiff.
Reasons
In fact, the Defendant: (a) on March 8, 2006, the real estate of this case (the real estate stated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table was 133 square meters in original size but was 133 square meters in size; (b) on July 27, 2012, the real estate stated in paragraph (3) of the attached Table was 242 square meters in its original size; (c) on July 27, 2012, the real estate was 81 square meters in size and its existing size was 1,235 square meters in the name of C; and (d) on the ground that the real estate of this case was 200,000,000 won in total and 2,000,000,000 won in total and 2,000,000,000 won in total (hereinafter the above miscellaneous land and 2,000,000 won in total and 3,000,000 won in total,00 won in each of the real property.
B. The Defendant received 6 million won down payment from C on the day of the instant sales contract, but thereafter, notified C, etc. of the cancellation of the instant sales contract on April 20, 2007 on the ground that C, etc. breached its obligation to pay the intermediate payment.
[Reasons for Recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff entered into a contract with E on October 10, 206, as to the absence of dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, Gap’s evidence Nos. 2-1 through 8, Eul’s evidence No. 4-4, Eul’s main claim, and the overall purport of the pleadings, and entered into a contract with E on October 10, 2006, and the Defendant and F, a co-owner of the instant real estate, the instant land and the instant land and the instant building, agreed or implied on the acceptance of the said contract, and C.