A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The Defendant shall pay 1,830,000 won to the applicant C.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On April 6, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon prison on the grounds of fraud, etc., and on October 27, 2017, the period of parole passed on December 18, 2017, when the sentence was executed by a female prison.

[Criminal facts] 2018 Highest 1121

1. On January 16, 2018, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s officetel located in Incheon City F, posted a notice on “sale of computer traffic cards and CPU” on the Internet server, and made a false statement on the Internet bulletin board of the State, stating that “on the transfer of money to the victim D, the remittance of money would sell the computer traffic cards, etc.”.

However, since the defendant did not have a computer traffic card, there was no intention or ability to send the goods even if he received money from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant: (a) received a remittance of KRW 1,360,000 from the new bank account (Account Number: G) in the name of the Defendant from the victim for the same day, such as the computer traffic card, from the victim; and (b) received a total of KRW 13,950,000 from January 4, 2018 to February 1, 2018, as described in the list of crimes in attached Table 11, as shown in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

2. On February 6, 2018, the Defendant shall deduct the victim J from the I main point located in the Incheon SiH “stumum that the Defendant supported by the company in which the Defendant works in the Republic of Korea.”

The studio penalty is required to be repaid three days after the loan of the money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as money for gambling, and there was no certain amount of income due to the situation in which the company was established, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the money.

The defendant was transferred 600,000 won to the national bank account (K) in the name of the defendant under the pretext of borrowing money from the damaged person on the same day.

In this respect.