1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 10, 201, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on October 10, 201 as a foreigner of the Federia’s nationality (hereinafter “Syria”), and was staying in the Republic of Korea on December 9, 201, after being changed to the status of stay for general training (D-4) and being changed to the status of stay on December 9, 201, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on November 5, 2013.

B. On September 11, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On October 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on October 13, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's argument that the plaintiff's 's 's 's 's plaintiff's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' was born to the

First, the plaintiff's first denial of the plaintiff's father's father's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

As a result, the plaintiff was always unable to properly locked the body of his blood and blood.

Therefore, the disposition of this case, which was conducted on a different premise, is unlawful, even though it is apprehended that the plaintiff would be stuffed from the first denial of the 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 난민법 제2조...