The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year and ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. All of the judgment crimes are recognized and reflected, the fact that an agreement has been reached with the victims, the first offender, and the fact that the family members of the defendant are leading is favorable.

However, the crimes of Bosing are not only organized but also serious social and economic harm, and the defendant also takes charge of education for so-called new students beyond withdrawal and remittance. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the degree of participation in the crime is not less easily but also considerable in size; (b) there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below; and (c) there is no change in circumstances after the decision of the court below; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to deem the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable

Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.