Text
1. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 11,194,280 as well as 5% per annum from September 8, 2015 to October 15, 2015.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. On October 7, 2014, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the entry of evidence No. 1 against the unpaid rent claim No. 1 for the non-Dong factory, the Plaintiffs are the building of the factory located D in the Defendant and Ansan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “building of this case”).
) Of the non-Dong buildings, a lease contract was concluded with a fixed term of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 8,694,000, and the term of lease from October 7, 2014 to January 6, 2015; the above building was delivered to the Defendant; and the Defendant did not pay all the unpaid rent during the lease period. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs the unpaid rent of KRW 26,082,00 (8,694,000 x 3 months x 16,000,000, which is the remainder after deducting the above unpaid rent of KRW 16,082,000 from the total rent of KRW 26,00,000,000, which is the remainder after deducting the lease deposit of KRW 16,082,000,000,0000, as it is sought by the Plaintiffs, taking into account the purport of pleading No. 2, the Defendant’s obligation to pay the unpaid electricity charges to the Plaintiffs for the above period of 6.
B. The part dismissing the Plaintiffs’ assertion 1) - The key point of the Plaintiffs’ claim is that the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, on September 5, 2014, stipulating that a deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 5.8 million, and the lease period from September 15, 2014 to December 14, 2014, and the lease deposit of KRW 10 million and KRW 17.4 million for three months from the Defendant’s advance payment of KRW 5.8 million x 3,000,000,000 (=5.8 million x 3,000,000) to the Defendant, but around that time, the Defendant did not deliver the building of the said Dong factory until the expiration date of the lease period.