Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by a fine of five million won for Defendant B.

However, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of the manufacture of gold-type automobile parts.

1. Defendant A employed 10 foreigners, each of whom was illegal aliens, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to work over 10 times from December 1, 2014 to August 29, 2016, including employment of D of Indonesia nationality, who had not been granted the status of sojourn eligible to work, and who had not been granted the status of sojourn eligible to work over 10 times, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B’s representative director, the Defendant Company B, committed a violation of employment of 10 foreigners, each of whom was illegal aliens who had no status of sojourn eligible to engage in employment activities over 10 times, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. An inquiry about a decision on review of, or notification on, an immigration offender, a list of illegal foreigners, or comprehensive records of immigration offenders;

1. Application of business registration certificate and entire certificate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 94 subparag. 9 and 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B: The main text of Article 99-3 subparag. 2, Article 94 subparag. 9, and Article 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act; the selection of fines

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B, Inc.: The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reaches ten illegal aliens employed by the Defendants, and that some of them are considerably long, the elements of sentencing unfavorable to the Defendants, or the fact that there are no criminal records of the same kind before the Defendants, and that there are no criminal records of the same kind, contrary to what is recognized, and that there are no criminal records of the same kind before the Defendants.