The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (4 million won in penalty, 40 hours in total, and 40 hours in total) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination; and (b) there are various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment seems unfair. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 398 of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, since it is obvious that the part of “Article 398 of the Criminal Act” in the second 14th th th 14 of the judgment below is a clerical error under Article 298 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the prosecutor’s appeal is ex officio correction in accordance with Article 25(1) of