Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2018, at around 12:30 on May 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported at the Defendant’s residence located in Seosan-si, C Apartment 107 Dong 1006; and (b) reported at 112, that “the husband is her husband;” and (c) prevented the Defendant, who was called up by the police officer B, who was under his/her desire to take care of, and assaulted the Defendant on his/her chest part, at his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. The work log and the list of reported cases;

1. Reporting on investigation (to hear statements by telephone from a victimized police officer);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 32(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits for Dismissal of Application for Compensation (the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties does not constitute a crime subject to a compensation order under each subparagraph of Article 25(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits) is that this case requires strict punishment as a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer who performs official duties. However, the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant's compensation and agreement with the victimized police officer, the fact that there was no criminal record heavier than the same criminal record or fine, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, means and consequence, circumstances after the crime, etc., and other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case shall be determined