beta
Text
1. Defendant EsPa Co., Ltd.:
A. Of the substitute rooms listed in the attached Form 1, the annexed Form 2 Map 1, 2, 3, 6.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) The Plaintiff, a public corporation established pursuant to Article 18 of the Urban Railroad Act and Article 49 of the Local Public Enterprises Act, is a public corporation established pursuant to the provisions of Article 18 of the Urban Railroad Act and Article 49 of the Local Public Enterprises Act, has implemented the Plaintiff’s collective shop development project for the purpose of promoting the convenience of users of urban railroads and contributing to the Plaintiff’s management rationalization by creating the idle space in the subway history as a group of theme space with a unique communication concept. (2) On April 7, 2008, the Plaintiff, as part of the above group of the development project, announced the Plaintiff’s bid for the rent-lease 236 square meters in order to promote the convenience of users of urban railroads and contribute to the Plaintiff’s management rationalization. (3) On April 7, 2008, the Plaintiff, as part of the above group of the development project, as part of the development project, as a group of the above third underground floors.
The method of tender is a competitive bid, total bid (total rent for five years), and accordingly, the monthly rent shall be the successful bid price/60 months, and the lease deposit shall be the nine-month rent.
In addition, the plaintiff shall bear all the expenses incurred in the construction and operation of a collective store in the notice of the above bidding, and the expenses of the business operator shall be handled even if it is necessary to supplement other facilities connected to the disposal of obstacles caused by the construction work and obstacles, and when the lease contract is terminated or terminated, all the facilities of the leased object related to the operation of the business shall be restored to the business operator's expense, and the business operator shall not claim for all the expenses incurred in the construction and operation of the leased object.
B. The Plaintiff and Defendant SPia’s lease agreement and the construction of the commercial facilities of Defendant SPia Co., Ltd. (1) are limited to the Defendant SPia Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SPA”).
this section.