logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2017.10.25 2017누22534
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the reasons are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The first instance court’s decision to dismiss the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff was guilty of the instant facts subject to disciplinary action. The instant disposition is legitimate, and contrary to this, it cannot be deemed an illegal disposition that deviates from or abused discretion by violating the principle of proportionality, etc.

The Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed, based on the judgment of the court of first instance. The Plaintiff basically repeats the same argument in the court of first instance. Thus, even if the Plaintiff’s partial supplement claims and the evidence submitted are examined closely by comparing them with the records, the first instance judgment is still justifiable.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow