logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.17 2018구단54296
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on November 25, 2016 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of Austria (Federia).

B. On December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on March 29, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a risk of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On April 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground on October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a country in which Egbo, the center of Egyna (Biafra)'s Egyrian South East East on May 30, 1967, led to a failure from the internal part of the Austrian Government Armed Forces, and was actually existed until it was merged with Austrian on January 15, 1970.

The name of Mafra is the public of the Republic of Mafra, and the name of Mafra has been independent of all countries, and the name of Mafra has been recognized as a positive state from some countries.

support the independence of such person.

From around 2016, the Plaintiff joined the organization B, which performs a non-fla independence movement, in a regular manner.

Since then, the Plaintiff became a regional representative for the dispute over the ABa, and served as a regional representative, and sent B’s message and host a meeting.

In addition, there is a meeting or demonstration in B.

arrow