logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.16 2016고단8926
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor by the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on August 5, 2015.

The Defendant, around 15:20 on October 30, 2016, the 2016 Highest 8926, the Defendant, in E operated by the victim D in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, and the 1st century, expressed the victim’s “Athmhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Inasmuch as “the hump” was expressed in a large sense, it obstructed the business of the victimized person by force, such as avoiding disturbance, preventing customers from entering the marina entrance, and preventing them from entering the marina entrance.

On February 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) found the victim G in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon on February 22:30, 2017, the Defendant: (b) found the victim G located in the Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (c) sought I living in 201; (d) but I opened the door on the ground that I would not open the door, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 160,000 by walking the door of 201.

The Defendant of “2017 Highest 3601” on December 20, 2016, the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol on L operated by the Victim K (51 years of age) in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on December 20, 2016.

for each depository institution.

In addition, if the person actually sees the president as soon as possible, and the victim prevented him from doing so, the victim interfered with the victim's business operation by avoiding disturbance due to the victim's hump theory, "Cex A", and by force over about 30 minutes, it interfered with the victim's business operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the defendants' statements at court (2016 Highest 8926);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (period of repeated crime, and confirmation of the same criminal record) 201 after the second sentence of 2633;

1. Each police statement made to I and G;

1. On-site photographs "2017 Highest 3601";

1. The K's statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow