logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.09.04 2014고단1975
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On November 22, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million at the Seoul East Eastern District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act or a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On April 20, 2014, the Defendant appealed two years after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime and filed an appeal on April 20, 2014 at the Sungnam Branch Branch of Suwon District Court for the same crime. On July 17, 2014, the Defendant is currently under suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul East East District Court, which was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on July 25, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) - The Defendant, “The 2014 Highest 1975” without obtaining a driver’s license, and around 14:20 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant driven Cho-do car at the 200km section from the Defendant’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the point of the 130.8km in the e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the Eup/Myeon.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) - the Defendant, around 17:50 on May 2, 2014, at around 17:50, the Defendant driven D body-ray car without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 700 meters from the front side of the Guro fire station located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, to the front side of the 408 Gyeongdo-ro, the same day from around 18:02 on the same day.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act - 2014 high-ranking 2162 shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the suspect operated the car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2 as a holder of the D C-WI car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Report on the situation of operation without a license;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. The credit bureau and the mandatory insurance association;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (former and previous records), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

arrow