Defendant

Each appeal by the prosecutor is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts did not recognize that the victim was a child or juvenile under the age of 19. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts. 2) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (a fine of KRW 10 million, and a 40-hour order) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) As to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court also asserted the same purport in the lower court’s judgment, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the following grounds: (a) on the third through fifth of the lower judgment, on the grounds that the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant was a child under 19 years of age, at least C was aware that he was a child under 19 years of age on account of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the victim (C)’s age at least 19 years of age, and that the Defendant said that he was aware that she was a child under 19 years of age while entering the telecom. Examining the reasoning

). 피고인의 이 부분 주장은 이유 없다. 2) 이 법원에서 추가하는 판단 가) 아래 피고인의 경찰에서의 진술에 의하더라도, 피고인은 채팅몬에서 “길게 말 안하고 볼사람!! 만날뷴(여 19세)” 채팅창을 클릭하여 C와 채팅하였으므로(증거기록 제23면), 채팅몬에서 C의 나이가 19세로 표시된 것을 확인하였다고 인정된다. 답: 프로필에 나이가 있었습니다. 수사관이 보여준 대화내역(증거기록 제16면)과 같이 제가 그 여성분과 채팅을 할 당시 채팅창에도 나이가 표시되어 있었습니다. 19세라구 나이가 표시되어 있었습니다. 나) 아래 피고인의 검찰에서의 진술에 의하더라도, C는 피고인이 모텔 비용을 계산할 당시 피고인 뒤에 서 있어서 모텔 주인이 C를...