(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.08 2013가합502375

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.08 2013가합502375

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 21, 2012, the Plaintiffs’ representatives filed a lawsuit with J (K birth, death on May 6, 2012) No. 2013, 502375 (the first case number was 2012 group 161534, but it was transferred thereafter, 2013 group 502375). On May 15, 2013, Plaintiff D or I, the heir of the deceased J, filed a lawsuit with the deceased J under the name of 2013 group 520892. On June 11, 2013, 2013, the deceased J withdrawn the part of the deceased case from among the case No. 5023755.

The birth of the deceased L (M., birth, hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) is the birth of the deceased.

On April 2006, an application for ascertaining the truth was submitted in the name of the court of Justice that the deceased was arrested by the police due to suspicion against North Korean forces around January 1, 1951, and was killed due to a testamentary gift from the deceased’s house after release.

B. On July 9, 2008, the Conciliation Committee rendered a statement of witness from the Plaintiff E by the J.

E premised on the fact that he was from J, he stated that “the deceased was in a preliminary autopsy after the outbreak of the Korean War on July 1950 by the military and police officers,” and that “the deceased was in the back part of the protocol of statement of witness in around 1949, the Korean War, or in the back part of the protocol of statement of witness in the year 1949, the latter part of the protocol of the Korean War.”

Maternity due to a aftermath of only one month after the police was detained in custody and adviser;

2. A death in 26.

C. On January 6, 2010, the Settlement Commission made a statement from J that “the deceased was admitted to the news report federation.” The Court, “The deceased was married at the time of marriage.”

6. 25. The end of 25. The accurate cause and time is unknown, but the police officer of the Rocheon Police Station led the Deceased.

Uniforms of police officers are ambiguous.

According to the deceased's assertion, the deceased was the adviser at the police station.

J did not directly see that the deceased was the adviser, and did not visit the deceased.

The Deceased shall be his house thereafter.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.05.21 2014구단93

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.26 2013가합22299

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.03 2014가단5260928

-서울고등법원 2016.06.30 2015나2025172

-대전고등법원(청주) 2015.01.13 2014나20760