A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud of September 4, 2008 is not guilty.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 12, 201, and had a record of the said judgment on October 22, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is the representative director and the representative director of the Dispute Resolution D established to establish a regional housing association in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City to implement apartment reconstruction, and the representative director of the F of the Dispute Resolution Committee established to establish a regional housing association in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to implement apartment reconstruction.

In fact, the defendant, although there is no intention and ability to establish the housing association, knew the investment of the housing association to give considerable profits, raise the awareness of deceiving money, and attracts investors in the GG which entered into a contract for the sale of money by proxy.

Around January 22, 2008, the Defendant: (a) around January 22, 2008, at the I office of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) through the J, an employee of the said I office, who is aware of the fact, to the victim K, who purchased a member of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu L reconstruction Project implemented in the Co., Ltd. D; (c) would be entitled to pay the amount of KRW 30 million at the membership fee of the members; (d) would be eligible for membership within one year, or KRW 50 million, such as profits. The Defendant would establish a collateral security right at 149m2 of M, a part of the project site.”

However, the defendant did not submit a business plan to the competent authority at the time in relation to the reconstruction project of the above apartment, and it was impossible to know the date of authorization for project implementation at any time. The defendant had a debt exceeding 1 billion won, and the office operation expenses, etc. in the operation of the LABD and the LAB, while there was a lack of funds to secure the right to use the land for the implementation of the project, etc., because there was a lack of funds to secure the right to use the land, etc. for the implementation of the project, and the above land provided as security to the victim is also a priority mortgage