beta
Text
1. The Defendants together with the Plaintiff KRW 30,000,000 and the Defendant Busan Pamp Co., Ltd. on March 5, 2014.
Reasons
1. The following facts are not in dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant B”), or can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the entire purport of the pleadings in the entries in subparagraph 1, subparagraph 1, and subparagraph 1, and between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Busan PP Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Busan P PPP”) pursuant to Article 150(1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Act.
A. On August 29, 2013, Defendant Busan PP issued a promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) with a face value of KRW 30,000,000 at face value, and the due date on March 5, 2014, the Busan PPP, Busan Bank, and Defendant B (C, but, around March 21, 2014, changed to D Co., Ltd.) and changed to “D Co., Ltd.” and delivered it to Defendant B (hereinafter “instant promissory note”).
B. On the back of the Promissory Notes of this case, the blank endorsement in the name of Defendant B is written in the column of the first endorser, the blank endorsement in the name of the Plaintiff in the column of the second endorser, and the blank endorsement in the name of the name of the Co., Ltd. in the name of the third endorser is written in the column of the third endorser, and each of the above endorsers is exempted from drawing up the protest of non-payment.
C. On March 5, 2014, the issuing date of the Promissory Notes was presented at the place of payment, but the said Promissory Notes was rejected on the ground of the receipt of the accident report. The Plaintiff, as the previous endorser of the Promissory Notes, paid the instant Promissory Notes to the company with issue of name, and cancelled the endorsement under the name of the company with issue of name while withdrawing the said Promissory Notes.
2. Determination:
A. According to the above findings of the determination as to the cause of the claim, Defendant Busan Pamp is the principal debtor who is the issuer of the Promissory Notes in this case, and Defendant B is the principal debtor who is the endorser of the Promissory Notes in this case, and the Plaintiff is jointly liable.