The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although the defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the facts charged, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. ① The victim, in the court of the court below, stated to the effect that "the victim was aware of a dispute between the defendant and the victim in the bus on June 12, 2017, and the bus engineer was ordered to get off the bus, and the defendant was able to get out of the bus, leading the victim into the bus, leading him into the bus, leading him to her to drinking and cutting down him. At least three to four times in the process, the victim was assaulted by the defendant, and the defect in the report 112 immediately after her escape." The victim's above statement is relatively consistent and specific with the main part of the facts charged, and is credibility after the victim made a consistent statement at an investigative agency. ② The victim was subject to an investigation by the investigative agency on June 12, 2017, and the victim was aware of the victim's attack within the bus without any specific attack, and the victim was not aware of the victim's attack within the bus.