logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.09.23 2016고단555
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking). On December 27, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 8 million at the same court.

Nevertheless, on February 21, 2016, the Defendant driven B motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.059% without obtaining a driver’s license from around 20km to the front road of the Young Apartment apartment located in the full accounting of Man-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Kim Jong-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license in the state of under the influence of alcohol.

2. On February 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:15, at the front of the Young Apartment-gu, Kim Jong-do, Kim Jong-do, the police officers in charge of traffic control at the Kim Jong-do Police Station in front of the Young Apartment-do, Kim Jong-do, in order to prevent drinking; (b) had the police officers in charge of traffic control over drinking; (c) had the students be punished for drinking driving; and (d) had the drivers of the driver’s statement in the circumstances of the state presented by the police officer, stated C’s personal information in the driver’s statement column presented by the police officer; (d) written C’s name in the statement column and affixed his/her seal thereon.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the State driver’s circumstantial statement report in the name of C, which is a private document on proof of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) above, submitted to police officers a false report on the circumstances of the driver’s statement forged at the same time and at the same time and at the same place, and exercised the said investigation document as if it were duly formed.

4. The Defendant shall sign the company’s signature at the time and place specified in paragraph 2 above.

arrow