logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.06.25 2018고단384
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, on March 4, 2015, has obtained permission to engage in food entertainment business from the Hongcheon-gun on business, and runs a singran bar in the trade name "C" in Hongcheon-gun B.

On January 26, 2018, around 21:58, when visiting the main points within the above main points, the following: (a) had the case of entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment service provider, and (b) had the case of entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment service provider, other than the case of entertainment entertainment service provider, receive 60,000 won from entertainment service provider, and provide customers and singing, and (c) sell the amount of 50,000 won at the market price of the entertainment service provider, such as beer and beer, to the said customer.

In such cases, pursuant to the Food Sanitation Act, a dan business operator shall not employ entertainment reception workers to allow them to provide entertainment entertainment services or encourage or impliedly encourage employees to do such acts.

Nevertheless, this method allowed entertainment entertainment visitors to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation book, business permit, or food entertainment business license management ledger;

1. Article 98 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and subparagraph 1 of Article 98 of the Food Sanitation Act, and Article 44 (3) of the same Act on the selective punishment (Selection of a punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have shown the attitude of reflecting the Defendant’s acknowledgement of his criminal act, and the fact that there is no criminal history other than the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are taken into account and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant argument, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, result of the crime, etc., as indicated in the text.

arrow